I've recently set up Windows file sharing over a gigabit ethernet network (I'm not using jumbo frames) with a Samba server and a Windows Vista client. I've done a few file copies, but the maximum throughput I'm seeing is 20MB/s (megabytes, not megabits) which is about 15% of the theoretical 125MB/s maximum for the network. The server has a RAID array that can manage about 75MB/s (the bottleneck is the PCI bus), and the client can manage about 40MB/s in a disk-to-disk copy. Notepad 6 2 3 end of world edition bible. I often have customers who ask me to wrestle with the performance of SMB (otherwise known as CIFS) across a WAN link. Their experience is usually that file transfers from Windows Explorer or from the command prompt don't meet their expectations of their inter-site link, even when FTP (ewwww!) performs much better. Oct 22, 2013 - Windows systems can connect to NFS shares using Services for NFS. Connecting to NFS shares is often. NFS vs SMB vs FTP vs SSH speed test results. Suddenly you need 1GB just for 10 users and 10GB for 100 users. Re: choice of file protocol (AFP vs CIFS vs NFS) I know this topic is stale but since the '4.x' firmware of the ReadyNAS now supports NFS over TCP, I wonder if the relative throughputs have been changed. Windows 10 Cifs ShareI should add that there was no other traffic on the network at the time. I understand I won't ever get the theoretical maximum, but I didn't think it would be this bad. What's the typical performance of Windows File Sharing (SMB) on a gigabit ethernet network? Bonus points: what can I tune (besides using jumbo frames) to make this faster? The quality of your network cards, switches, and cabling can all have an effect. Batman arkham city fix crack windshield. It might be worth searching for reviews of the NICs and switch(es) you are using to see if other people report them as not performing too well. Nfs Smb CifsI'm tol that built-into-the-mothboard NICs are worse of Gbit transfers, though in my experience this doesn't seem to make much, if any, difference in my environment. As a point of reference, I've just install a new Gbit switches in our office (replacing old 100Mbit switches) and large SMB transfers run at close to (but less than) 30Mbyte/sec between each combination of machines I tested. I've just done a quick test with netcat between two of the machines and got similar results so I don't think that SMB is the bottleneck. The two machines I just tested do have two switches between them which may have an effect, but I guess that effect is minimal given how close the figures where to an SMB transfer to a machine on the same switch. The best transfer rate I've seen over a Gbit network was a little shy of 50Mbyte/sec at its fastest. This was while transferring a drive image from one machine to a file on the other (for the purposes of converting to a VMWare virtual drive. In that case the two machines were connected via a short cross-over cable rather then via a switch. Coincidently one of the machines in question was one of the machines I've just tested and got ~29Mbyte/sec from - the most likely culprit for the main bottleneck in my case is probably the 8 year old wiring in the building that may have been done on the cheap! A quick (and equally unscientific) test on my little home network sees transfer rates more like 35Mbyte/sec copy a file from a Samba share to a Windows box and 25Mbyte/sec in the other direction (I'm not sure why there is a discrepancy there as in both cases the copy was manages by teracopy on the Windows box - I might have to investigate that further at some later time). Jumbo frames are going to make a difference for bulk transfers, so I suggest you give that a try if all your kit supports them properly. Nfs Cifs ComparisonTo cut a long story short: going by my anecdotal experience your 20Mbyte/sec is a bit slow, but not massively so. All my Windows and Samba installs are pretty much completely untuned, so I suspect that your hardware/wiring are the difference between what I see and what you see. Edit Of course, five years on from this answer, hardware and software has moved on. I often see 90+ MiB/sec transfers on machines with Gbit networking even with cheap kit. My home media/backup/other server seems limited to a little over 60 for bulk for transfers but that seems to be samba being CPU-bound on a single core of the box's hardware. Hack de oro para wow colombia inicio roblox. Wow Box Hack Apk Download World Of Warcraft Monk Name Generator World Of Warcraft 70 Private Server Wow Lumber Hack Hack Para Wow Colombia 4.3.4. Oct 21, 2018 - World Of Warcraft Sound Glitch Wow Item Creator German Hack De Oro En Wow Colombia Wow Legion Dps Hack Hacker Para Wow Brasil. Jul 9, 2018 - Hack Para Wow Cataclysm Monster. Warcraft 3 Battlenet Gold Hack. Hack Teleport Wow Colombia. Hack De Oro Wow Pandashan. Aug 22, 2018 - Inicio; » Juicio de Alimentos; » Wow Macro Hacks. As such, it can be a top performer on raids or PvP, World of Warcraft is mere days away from entering a. Hack Para Wow Colombia Cataclysm. Hack Oro Wow 5.4.8. Cabling shouldn't be an issue for me, the gigabit portion of my network is completely CAT6. I can't use jumbo frames because my (home) network is heterogeneous - I've got wifi and a 100Mbit segment - and it's my understanding that jumbo frames are gigabit-only. Though, if I could limit jumbo frames to certain pairs of hosts, that might work. That's a good point about the hardware. All of mine is consumer grade; I'll have to look into that. Another thought that I had is how the built-in NICs are connected may be an issue. If one's on the PCI bus, that could be a factor. – Nov 22 '09 at 22:42 •. Ahh.this is where it is important for a server guy to understand what's under the hood. Since this is two years old I figure he's solved it already. However for posterity or anyone with a similar issue what he probably ran into is this (TCP window size * 8bits / RTT in milliseconds) = Max TCP throughput in bps While you might have a Gigabit network a single TCP flow won't likely be able to get that high.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |